We read with interest your letter "Anaphylaxis to dye during breast surgery" [1]. You report a high incidence of anaphylaxis to Patent Blue V dye in a small number of patients over a 21-month-period, compared with the reported incidence of 0.86% allergic reactions to Patent Blue V dye from the combined datasets of the ALMANAC trial and NEW START training programme (n=7,917) [2]. These patients were given either 2mls of 2.5% aqueous solution of Patent Blue V diluted to 5mls with normal saline or 2 mls undiluted patent blue V dye. It has been shown that there is a trend towards fewer allergic reactions with smaller volumes of blue dye, with no difference in the success of sentinel lymph node identification with dye volumes from 1-5mls [3]. Considering the high incidence of allergic reactions, is it possible that your figures relate to higher volume of blue dye usage?
A. Hegarty
A. Merrigan
S. O Riain
Limerick University Hospital
Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
E-mail: aoifehegarty1@gmail.com
No external funding and no competing interests declared.
References.
1. Robinson L. Anaphylaxis to dye during breast surgery. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 841-842
2. Barthelmes L, Goyal A, Newcombe RG, McNeill F, Mansel RE. Adverse reactions to patent blue V dye - the NEW START and ALMANAC experience.
European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2010;36:399-403
3. King TA et al. A prospective analysis of the effect of blue-dye volume on sentinel lymph node mapping success and incidence of allergic reactions in
patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11(5):535-41